War of the Worlds

June 29th, 2005

Get the poster


510736_Netflix 1 Month Free Trial - Instantly Watch Unlimited Films and TV Episodes

War of the Worlds

Still of Tim Robbins in War of the WorldsWar of the WorldsJustin Chatwin at event of War of the WorldsStill of Tom Cruise and Dakota Fanning in War of the WorldsStill of Tom Cruise and Dakota Fanning in War of the WorldsStill of Steven Spielberg in War of the Worlds

As Earth is invaded by alien tripod fighting machines, one family fights for survival.

Release Year: 2005

Rating: 6.5/10 (173,653 voted)

Critic's Score: 73/100

Director: Steven Spielberg

Stars: Tom Cruise, Dakota Fanning, Tim Robbins

Ray Ferrier (Cruise) is a divorced dockworker and less-than-perfect father. When his ex-wife and her new husband drop off his teenage son Robbie and young daughter Rachel for a rare weekend visit, a strange and powerful lightning storm suddenly touches down. What follows is the extraordinary battle for the future of humankind through the eyes of one American family fighting to survive it in this contemporary retelling of H.G. Wells seminal classic sci-fi thriller.

Writers: Josh Friedman, David Koepp

Tom Cruise - Ray Ferrier
Dakota Fanning - Rachel Ferrier
Miranda Otto - Mary Ann
Justin Chatwin - Robbie
Tim Robbins - Harlan Ogilvy
Rick Gonzalez - Vincent
Yul Vazquez - Julio (as Yul Vázquez)
Lenny Venito - Manny the Mechanic
Lisa Ann Walter - Bartender
Ann Robinson - Grandmother
Gene Barry - Grandfather
David Alan Basche - Tim
Roz Abrams - Herself
Michael Brownlee - TV Reporter, Osaka
Camillia Sanes Monet - News Producer (as Camillia Sanes)

Taglines: They're already here.


Official Website: Paramount Pictures [United States] |

Release Date: 29 June 2005

Filming Locations: Athens, New York, USA

Box Office Details

Budget: $132,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend: £8,644,787 (UK) (3 July 2005) (507 Screens)

Gross: $588,929,061 (Worldwide)

Technical Specs


Did You Know?

The organism seen in the opening sequence is known as the Paramecium, being a unicellular pond water protozoan that is a eukaryote, shown complete with cilia, oral groove, macro nucleus and central vacuole.

Revealing mistakes: Robbie does not catch anything in his glove when Ray throws the ball at him, a second later a ball magically appears. This happens as Robbie says: "Is it OK with you if I laugh the first 500 times you tell that one?"

[first lines]
Narrator: No one would have believed in the early years of the 21st century that our world was being watched by intelligences greater than our own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns, *they* observed and studied, the way a man with a microscope might scrutinize the creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water...

User Review

A brilliant alien invasion film for the first two acts

Rating: 6/10

What Spielberg, Cruise, and Koepp accomplish here in the first two acts is nothing short of revolutionary. They've made a big-budget summer blockbuster about massive destruction and action that manages to studiously avoid every cliché and expectation of such films. It stays resolutely on the characters' points of view, showing us almost nothing they don't see, even to the point of coming tantalizingly close to a raging battle, then avoiding showing it. It keeps its focus on character instead of spectacle. The "hero" of the piece remains decidedly unheroic, wanting only to escape, and trying to talk others out of fighting back. The purpose of every piece of action is to frighten and disturb rather than thrill, making ingenious use of familiar 9/11 imagery. At the end of the second act, it is hands-down the best alien invasion film ever made, and perhaps one of the best sci-films of all time.

Then something strange happens. The filmmakers lose their nerve, and remember that this is an extremely expensive summer film financed by two studios. Or perhaps it was the fact that it stars Tom Cruise, who up to this point has spent almost two hours doing nothing but run for his life. Suddenly, and tragically, the film changes, violating not only its carefully established tone, but its own internal logic. Suddenly, Cruise begins to act like a hero, and summer action clichés force their way into the story like a worm into an apple. The transition is jarring, and it creates a serious disconnect from the story.

While it's true that Wells' original ending creates a problem for a movie, here they try to remain faithful to it, while still shoehorning moments of triumph into the conclusion. Unfortunately, these moments come off as alternately false, unbelievable, and meaningless, since it isn't mankind that defeats the invaders in the end.

Is it recommendable? Well, I suppose that depends on what kind of viewer you are. If you feel that 75% brilliant material overshadows the 25% that falls apart, then you'll enjoy it. If, however, you're the kind of viewer who feels that the final impression a movie makes is its ultimate stamp on your memory, you may be in for a crushing disappointment. On the other hand, if you're the kind of viewer who just likes the cliché of the boom-boom summer action spectacle, you're likely to be bored and frustrated with the first two acts, and only engage in the end. It is confused about what audience it's trying to reach, and consequently, isn't likely to satisfy any of them.

Holiday BlockBusters at AllPoster!
Holiday BlockBusters at AllPoster!


Comment on “War of the Worlds”

Name :




510736_Netflix 1 Month Free Trial - Instantly Watch Unlimited Films and TV Episodes

Upcoming Film Releases|Movie Posters